Why Your CPO Network Stops Where the DNO Says It Does

James Foster • May 12, 2026

Share this article

So you run a CPO. The dashboard says four thousand sites live, the press release said six thousand by next year, the investors want ten thousand by 2028 and the development team has just dropped over a list of forty potential sites where the DNO has quoted eighteen months minimum, three of them with a connection bill that would make a Range Rover blush. That is the gap between the strategy slide and the spreadsheet, and it is getting wider every quarter.

CPO network expansion has hit a wall that nobody really saw coming three years ago. It is not demand, demand is fine. It is not equipment, the hardware vendors are queuing up the loading bay. It is the grid, and the planning, and the ground works, and the asbestos under the forecourt, and the leaseholder who wants a sit down before you cut into the tarmac. Every site you actually want is the one that takes two years to deliver.

The map with the white spaces

Look at your coverage map. You know the bits you do not like to think about. The A road between two motorway services where every Tesla driver is hunting for a charger. The retail park on the edge of a market town where Sainsburys would let you in tomorrow if you would just bring the kit. The country pub group with seventy sites that wants a partner. The travel plaza next to a junction the DNO will not touch until 2028.

These are not edge cases. These are the sites where your competitors are not yet present, the ones where you would win market share tomorrow if you could just get a charger live. And right now you cannot, because the eighteen month rule applies to all of them.

Why the static site model breaks at the edges

The economics of the traditional CPO site work brilliantly at a transformer that already exists with spare capacity. They fall apart the moment you need an upgrade. A 1MVA DNO connection in the South East is now quoted at £180,000 plus, before any cabling, ground works or commissioning. Twelve to twenty four months later you have a site. By then your nearest rival has probably stuck up a competing hub two miles down the A road.

The other problem nobody talks about is leasehold. Most of the genuinely useful sites are leased, not owned. Spending £400,000 on ground works for a fifteen year lease with a five year break clause is a board level decision and it should be. Static infrastructure ties your capital to dirt you do not own.

FreeMe as the bridge

FreeMe is the containerised side of the PowerMe range. ISO container footprint, 8ft through to 40ft depending on the capacity you need, from 150kWh up to 3MWh. A hybrid chemistry with LFP doing the bulk storage and Toshiba SCiB lithium titanate on the front of the system to absorb the 4C peak demand. Off grid capable, so it does not need a DNO upgrade to deliver 200kW, 350kW or higher to the dispensers.

What that means in CPO terms is straightforward. You pick the site. The container drops in on a crane. There is no trench, no transformer, no DNO wait, no eight hundred pound a yard ground works bill from a contractor who has decided this week is the week to ask for danger money. The dispensers go up. The unit recharges from the existing supply trickle, or from a smaller grid connection you can actually get, and it serves the kerb at full output.

Two weeks from order to live. Sometimes faster, depending on what the site needs above ground.

The commercial bit and why it matters to the CPO P&L

You have two ways to take the kit. Lease, which keeps the unit on PowerMe's balance sheet, gives you a fixed monthly payment and full operational control of the energy revenue. Or Energy as a Service, where PowerMe funds the asset, deploys it, owns and operates it, and you take a profit share for branding the dispensers and bringing the site. EaaS is how the network expands without burning your own capital, and it makes more sense than you might think for the sites you would never have built off your own balance sheet anyway.

Either way the asset is mobile. If the site underperforms the container comes off and goes to one that does. That is a thing static infrastructure can never offer you. The leaseholder ends the lease, the kit walks. The retail park footfall drops, the kit walks. The local DNO finally delivers a grid upgrade in 2029, the kit walks to the next eighteen month gap site. Capital does not get stranded under tarmac you do not own.

The reason all this matters is simple. The CPOs who win the next phase of the market will not be the ones with the biggest cheque book for ground works. They will be the ones who can put kilowatts where the cars actually are, faster than anyone else, and move them when the demand pattern shifts. That is a different business model and the kit has to match it.

Get in touch: info@powerme.energy / +44 20 8050 8198 / www.powerme.energy

Recent Posts

By James Foster May 24, 2026
Pub estates and hotel car parks have Britain's longest dwell times and almost no working chargers. The containerised FreeMe approach fixes that without trenching.
By James Foster May 23, 2026
Business parks have thousands of staff cars and almost no chargers. PowerMe FreeMe drops in on EaaS so the landlord pays nothing and earns a profit share.
By James Foster May 22, 2026
Exhibition halls fill for one week in twelve. Static EV chargers gather dust between events. Mobile rapids and off-grid containers fix the maths.
By James Foster May 21, 2026
British festivals talk green but burn diesel by the tanker load. LTO battery power finally makes silent, zero-emission festival energy commercially viable.
By James Foster May 20, 2026
UK energy retailers want B2B EV charging revenue but the DNO holds the queue. PowerMe FreeMe and TitanMe Max deploy off grid with no trench, no wait.
By James Foster May 19, 2026
Retail park tenants want EV chargers and the landlord gets the capex bill. PowerMe FreeMe drops in off grid on EaaS, no trench, no DNO, profit share back.
Show More